Skip to main content

AI Tools That Make Web Development Easier! 😊

Hey developers! 👋

We all have faced endless debugging, repetitive tasks, or struggled to get the perfect design. But what if AI could make things easier for us? 😅

In this post, I'll share some AI tools that have helped me save time and make web development less frustrating. If you’ve got your own favorites, feel free to share in the comments—I’d love to know what’s working for you!

  1. GitHub Copilot: Your Coding Buddy 🤖 You might have heard about GitHub Copilot. It’s like having a coding partner who suggests code completions and helps you write boilerplate code. Great for speeding up your workflow, especially with repetitive tasks.

Why it’s useful:

    • It suggests code as you type—sometimes even entire blocks!
    • Works with many languages, like JavaScript and Python.
    • You can learn new coding techniques along the way.

Question: Have you tried Copilot? Has it made a big difference in your coding process?

  1. Tabnine: Fast Autocompletion 🚀 If you’re looking for something lighter, Tabnine might be perfect. It gives fast, AI-powered code suggestions without taking over completely.

Why it’s useful:

    • Quick, smaller code hints that keep you moving.
    • Learns from your coding style over time.
    • Works offline, so no need to rely on the internet.

Question: Have you used Tabnine with Copilot? Do you think using both together improves productivity, or is it too much?

  1. ChatGPT: Debugging Helper 🛠️ ChatGPT isn’t just for chatting! It can help you debug tricky issues or explain complex coding concepts when you need a little extra help.

Why it’s useful:

    • Can help walk you through debugging step-by-step.
    • Great for brainstorming ideas when you're stuck.
    • Helpful for those late-night coding sessions.

Question: How do you use ChatGPT in your work? Is it more helpful for problem-solving or for generating new ideas?

  1. Figma AI Plugins: Design Made Simple 🎨 For designers, Figma AI plugins like Magician make design workflows faster and easier. They can generate icons, create color palettes, and simplify layouts.

Why it’s useful:

    • Quickly generate color schemes or layouts with less effort.
    • Helps with prototyping without getting bogged down in details.

Question: Do AI design tools improve your process, or do you still prefer doing it manually?

  1. DALL·E & MidJourney: Create Custom Visuals 🖼️ If you need quick visuals for your project, DALL·E and MidJourney can generate custom images based on descriptions, perfect for placeholders or quick designs.

Why it’s useful:

    • Saves time by generating images instantly.
    • Great for early-stage prototypes or client presentations.

Question: Do you use AI-generated images in real projects, or are they more of a temporary solution for you?

  1. AI Testing Tools: Speed Up QA AI-powered testing tools like Lighthouse can automate performance, SEO, and accessibility tests, making the QA process quicker and more effective.

Why it’s useful:

    • Automatically flags issues like performance or accessibility problems.
    • Can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines for continuous testing.

Question: What testing tools do you use? Do you trust AI for testing critical functions?

  1. Code Snippets AI: Reuse Code Effortlessly ♻️ Code Snippets AI helps you reuse code by suggesting snippets from previous projects, making it easier to keep your code clean and efficient.

Why it’s useful:

    • Keeps your code DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself).
    • Helps with code reuse across projects.

Question: How do you manage your code snippets? Do you use AI tools, or do you keep them organized manually?

Wrapping Up

AI isn’t here to replace developers, but it’s certainly making our work easier! Whether it’s coding, designing, or testing, there’s an AI tool that can help you streamline your tasks.

Now it’s your turn—what AI tools do you use? Any favourites I didn’t mention? Let’s discuss in the comments!

Happy coding, everyone! 🚀

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PowerShell: Get Actual Error

I was having hard time to find the reason why I was not able to find a custom method in a .Net DLL. Find your Assembly: PS C:\vstsagent\A1\_work\r1\a\_DevOps_CI\Scripts > [appdomain]::currentdomain . getassemblies() | Where - Object FullName - Match "MyAssembly" GAC Version Location --- ------- -------- False v4 . 0.30319 C:\vstsagent\A1\_work\r1\a\_DevOps_CI\Scripts\Tools\MyAssembly . dll PS C:\vstsagent\A1\_work\r1\a\_DevOps_CI\Scripts & gt; $ a = [appdomain]::currentdomain . getassemblies() | Where - Object FullName - Match "MyAssembly" PS C:\vstsagent\A1\_work\r1\a\_DevOps_CI\Scripts & gt; $ a GAC Version Location --- ------- -------- False v4 . 0.30319 C:\vstsagent\A1\_work\r1\a\_DevOps_CI\Scripts\Tools\MyAssembly . dll When I was trying to get the Types in the assembly, I was getting the exception: PS C:\vstsagent\A1\_work\r1\a\_DevOps_CI\Scripts > ...

What is release, and what is a deployment?

T o understand the concepts and the technical implementation in many tools, you need to know how tool vendors define the difference between a release and a deployment. A  release  is a package or container containing a versioned set of artifacts specified in a release pipeline in your CI/CD process. It also includes a snapshot of all the information required to carry out all the tasks and activities in a release pipeline, such as: The stages or environments. The tasks for each one. The values of task parameters and variables. The release policies such as triggers, approvers, and release queuing options. On the other hand,  Deployment  is the action of running the tasks for one stage, which results in a tested and deployed application and other activities specified for that stage. Starting a release starts each deployment based on the settings and policies defined in the original release pipeline. There can be multiple deployments of each release, even for one stage. ...

Release approvals

Continuous Delivery is all about delivering on-demand.  But, as we discussed in the differences between release and deployment, delivery, or deployment, it's only the technical part of the Continuous Delivery process.  It's all about how you can technically install the software on an environment, but it doesn't say anything about the process that needs to be in place for a release. Release approvals don't control  how  but control  if  you want to deliver multiple times a day. Manual approvals also suit a significant need. Organizations that start with Continuous Delivery often lack a certain amount of trust. They don't dare to release without manual approval. After a while, when they find that the approval doesn't add value and the release always succeeds, the manual approval is often replaced by an automatic check. Things to consider when you're setting up a release approval are: What do we want to achieve with the approval? Is it an approval that we need...